Personal Reflection
Experiential Learning
The assignment asking for educational applications was an exceptionally useful one. It made me think of ways to integrate Ning into the existing NYS curriculum standards and not just how *I* would use it in my current life. Breaking down the steps to instructing a new user was also good practice for future technology instruction and leadership. It was interesting that Ning was going through a fee-structure change just as I was studying it, adding a layer to my analysis that might not have been present otherwise. In fact, this change has led me to investigate similar social networks and expanded my understanding as to what is available to educators.
Educator Use
Ning is best used by educators as a means to either network with each other in a controlled, invitation-only environment or to use with students for social networking lessons or curriculum-related online interactions in a walled garden.
Ning’s change to three-tiered pay model affects educators who have to make changes to existing Ning networks or seek other sites such as grou.ps, which offers a link on migrating a Ning network on the signup window. While Ning has ad-free and cost-free options for classrooms of students ages 13-18, college-level or professional development Ning networks do not have these options. I do like some of the examples of uses in schools – such as using the user profile and blog features as part of an internet literacy lesson on guarding privacy online – but it seems like Ning is having some issues and may not be a stable platform. It is a business, and there’s no seamless way to monetize that will upset no one, but if there are other options that are free and ad-free, those might be preferable. Davis (2010) addresses this flexibility in her recent article:
"There's always going to be something else or somebody else providing something similar… Buy into the idea of it, not necessarily the particular tool."I have been encouraged by the many ideas of using Ning in a school setting or among educators. However, perhaps the most valuable outcome of this reflection is that I feel free to either use Ning or another social network in the school library in my future, depending on the current features and costs of the specific technology and the needs of my students.
Bibliography
Davis, Michelle R. (May 12, 2010) “Educators Eye Ning Transition to a Pay Model.” Education Week. Bethesda: Vol. 29, Iss. 31.
Overview of Ning changes and the potential to affect how and whether educators will continue to use their Ning networks.
Dickens, Seth (January 6, 2009) “Ning Social Networks – Unsuitable for Education?” DigitaLang: Teaching Languages with Web 2.0 Technology (blog). Accessed at: http://www.digitalang.com/2009/01/ning-social-networks-unsuitable-for-education/
Blog post expressing dissatisfaction with several elements of Ning as the author has used it for both professional networking and in a classroom. Follow-up comments add to the discussion.
Holcomb, Lori B., Brady, Kevin P., Smith, Bethany V. (2010) “The Emergence of ‘Educational Networking’: Can Non-commercial, Education-based Social Networking Sites Really Address the Privacy and Safety Concerns of Educators?” Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, Vol. 6, No. 2, June 2010. Accessed at: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no2/holcomb_0610.htm
Report of a study addressing the safety concerns of using social networks in an educational setting, with emphasis on distance education. Comparison of private networks such as Ning and public ones such as Facebook.